A theoretical and empirical comparison of river health assessment methods of ISC from Australia,RCE from Sweden and URHA from China was made in respects of application objects,index selection,weight setting,standard enactment and results presentation.

• 针对澳大利亚的溪流状况指数(ISC)、瑞典的农业景观区域河岸带与河道环境评估方法(RCE)、国内的城市河流健康评价体系(URHA)等河流健康评价方法,从理论及实证两方面系统比较了其在应用对象、指标选择、权重设定、标准设定、结果表达等方面的异同。