您要查找的是不是：
- Cholera is an acute bacterial infection of the intestine caused by ingestion of food or water containing Vibrio cholerae, serogroups O1 or O139. 霍乱是一种摄入含有01或0139血清群霍乱弧菌食物或水所引起的急性肠道细菌性感染。
- Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftizoxime sodium injection in the treatment of acute bacterial infection. 目的评价国产注射用头孢唑肟钠(第3代头孢类抗生素)治疗急性细菌性感染的安全性和有效性。
- This study suggests that AMX/SBT is an effective and safe drug for treating acute bacterial infections. 阿莫西林/舒巴坦钠治疗急性细菌性感染临床疗效确切,使用安全。
- Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of amoxicillin/sulbactam (AMX/SBT) in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. 目的 评价阿莫西林/舒巴坦钠治疗急性细菌性感染的有效性和安全性。
- Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of domesticpiperacillin/tazobactam with those of Timentin in treatment of acute bacterial infections. 目的比较国产哌拉西林钠/三唑巴坦钠与对照药特美汀治疗急性细菌感染性疾病的临床疗效和安全性。
- Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of domestic piperacillin/tazobactam with those of Timentin in treatment of acute bacterial infections. 目的比较国产哌拉西林钠/三唑巴坦钠与对照药特美汀治疗急性细菌感染性疾病的临床疗效和安全性。方法采用多中心随机对照和开放试验方法。
- Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefodizime and Modivid,an imported cefodizime,in treatment of acute bacterial infections. 目的:评价头孢地嗪和莫敌(进口头孢地嗪)治疗急性细菌性感染的临床疗效和安全性。
- The data suggested that etimicin sulfate is effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. 结论：硫酸依替米星是一个安全有效的治疗急性细菌性感染的抗菌药物。
- Conclusion Domestic doxycycline hydrochloride for injection is effective and safe for the treatment of slight and moderate acute bacterial infections. 结论国产注射用盐酸多西环素治疗轻、中度急性细菌性感染的临床疗效确切，安全性较好。
- Conclusion:Domestic cefodizime is an effective and safe agent in treatment of acute bacterial infections as compare with imported drug Modivid. 结论:头孢地嗪治疗急性细菌性感染性疾病安全、有效，与莫敌生物等效。
- ABSTRACT Objective To compare the efficacies between gatifloxacin tablets and levofoxacin tablets in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. 目的比较加替沙星片与左氧氟沙星片治疗急性细菌性感染的疗效。
- CONCLUSION:Levofloxacin is of better cost-effectiveness advantage than gatifloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. 结论与加替沙星比较,左氧氟沙星治疗急性细菌性感染更具成本-效果优势。
- Objective: To compare the clinical and bacterial efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-tazobactam versus cefoperazone-sulbactam in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. 目的:评价国产头孢哌酮三唑巴坦治疗急性细菌性呼吸道感染、泌尿道感染以及其他系统感染的有效性与安全性。
- Keywords Lenampicillin;Amoxicillin;Acute bacterial infection; 仑氨西林;阿莫西林;急性细菌性感染;
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of group A as against group B was41.CONCLUSION:Levofloxacin is of better cost-effectiveness advantage than gatifloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. A组相对于B组的增量成本-效果比为41。 结论与加替沙星比较,左氧氟沙星治疗急性细菌性感染更具成本-效果优势。
- Acute epiglottitis is usually caused by a bacterial infection. 摘要急性会厌炎，一般多因感染所造成。
- Bacterial infection that can be cured. 细菌感染可以治愈。
- Cholera is a bacterial infection of the intestines. 霍乱是细菌感染肠道的疾病。
- Mastitis can spread as a bacterial infection. 乳腺炎能通过细菌感染传播。
- Acute inflammation of the pelvis of the kidney, caused by bacterial infection. 肾盂炎由细菌感染引起的肾盂的严重发炎
