Daubert challenge would most likely mean an expensive, arduous pretrial event; as a result, the challenge swings legal economics away from cases where the science is new, Michaels argues.
英
美
- 在审判前,以道伯特案的裁定提出质疑,几乎注定是花钱且费力的事;因此迈可斯认为,以法律的经济学而言,对于牵涉新兴科学的案例,离得越远越好。